Extended again? Makes one feel like as they dug into this over the past three months the unexpected and complex surfaced. Perhaps someone can write a book on this sometime? This is ridiculous. The WP is playing shrewdly as usual.
Yet there is another more plausible reason for the delay. They are not giving the investigation priority. Some officials many be agreeing to and canceling interviews. This is really bad. If you haven't done anything wrong, surely you want to get this behind you. The public is very interested. Hoping that we would forget is a waste of time. I am blogging about it to help the busy me remember!
Update: 11am
Many remember and are rightly disgusted. Three hours after Today shared this just on one forum we have the following.
- Zhiyi Deng The dirt is too much to be swept under the carpet, so they need more time to find a bigger carpet. I'm not surprised if they extend it till 2016!!!
- Guo Xiongwei <<“Investigations do take time, I’m sure the Government is considering this very seriously.”>>
***
1. AIM, fully-owned by NEW PAP, bought something from NEW PAP & NEW PAP need more than THREE months to write a report over it??
Btw, how long did they ta...See More - Sharon Ng soon, akan datang, but dunno when. loddat also can. accountability leh, taxpayers pay MND one leh.
- Richard Tan Other case so fast , arrest first and give bail ....
CPIB charge first then drag for months then no case ...,,
AIM - slowly slowly .... Another Christmas coming ..... - Marc Wang PAP must have a big team of talented officials writing and vetting this one report - where most facts of the case are already readily available to them, yet they are still taking months and the report is still outstanding.
I'm sure they can do better. - Keng Ann Yap Meanwhile, if they want to, they can get any cartoonist whom they suspect to have committed an seditious offence
- Mboyan Atuk You see , SGporean have been expecting this issue will be drag...drag...and drag...till we forget....!!!
At the same time , they try their best to sweep it under their best carpet.......and Sgporean are just waiting for the " Akan Datang " news from them.....phuck......!!! - William Lim The discussion of 6.9 million population policy can be done in a week in parliament. This AIM takes more than 3 months. What government is this ?
- Choy Weng Leong the conflict of interest clause is quite clear in the town council ACT, so its really a simple matter of a. was there a deemed conflict of interest when pap councils sell to a pap company? if yes, was such interest declared? did the related parties the...See More
- Lv Lim Sweep under carpet? More like vacuumed into oblivion. Anyway what do u think the outcome will be if there is gonna be any??
- Suai Ke Lin very complicated..something that is supposed to be non-issue becomes hot issue....if not for WP win over Aljunied GRC!!!
- James Lim Its better they hang a few scapegoats than to lose the integrity of the whole party. Hopefully that scapegoat will reveal more of the dirt under the carpet once he is prosecuted. Whatever the outcome my votes wont go to the white anymore for sure.
- Alex Wong Dirty linen need to be cleaned, bleached and washed until white white then can show to the public to win praise.
- Junbin Neo That means 2 people fail their KPI for the year, will they still get fat bonus this year???
Update: May 3 3:50pm
Public unhappiness works. See the PM statement via MND. Let's see we are just getting a case of right by the letter but not the spirit of the regulation come May 13
Update: May 4 9:10am
I hate it whenever a ST headline is qualified with quote marks.
So it was an misunderstanding? Everything that goes wrong can always be labeled as caused by misunderstandings.
In the first place, the committee looking into this is has no credibility. It was just a scheme to help the government wiggle out of an inconvenient and potentially embarrassing spot.
Now I like to see how the WP will respond when parliament sits on the 13th. Meanwhile the blogosphere here would be alight over this subject.
IMO, the story goes somehing like this. The investigative committee knows this is a public witchhunt. Even though they can find no wrongdoings in the AIM saga, the committee knows that the public wants to see a scapegoat sent to the slaughter. This is indeed a lose-lose dilemma, which is the reason for the delay in issuing a public judgement.
ReplyDelete