Talking Point: Yes 73%, No 27%

The program started with Yes and No divided down the middle but as program wears on Yes kept getting more support until we have this at closing. This is really what you want to know. You listen to TCJ, he was just saying the same thing in various permutations. How could he not lose ground and support?

The government can't turn back the clock. They could only minimize their losses, but Singaporeans should bear in mind that we are also losers with them too.

I had blamed LHL's government for being out of touch with the Pop. White Paper. How could I have let off the admins service who run the machinery to produce policy options for the PM and his ministers? I think we really need to kick asses in the admin service too. I started to notice how out of touch they were when their chief Peter Ong made some of the dumbest remarks for ST.

It's very sad when erstwhile smart people do not know that they have lost it. Don't forget that at the end of the Qing dynasty, many high ranked officials were very smart people too but they lost it.

Admin officers must make policies for real people and not for an imaginary wished for population. If they don't bother to spend time and heart to know us, I think we should replace them. Why keep them when we can't use them? They could start with the chairman and CEO of MDA for this stinking piece of regulation they have offered us.

Update: 11:25pm

Fools try to regulate the Internet. The sagacious regulator guide and influence it. Even enlightened parents know. Why do we pay them so much to get a big F from them. Such incompetence.

Update: June 5, 7:00am

See the programme on YouTube. See how TCJ valiantly tried to defend the government's position by repeating the same lyrics to different tunes. They know they can't guide or influence us, come on, they have no street cred here. It's all damage control.