Thursday, January 3, 2013

Teo Ho Pin's confusing rebuttal

I first read this last night at Singapolitics. Very labored reading. Then I read the original statement by Teo Ho Pin, which was easier. Conclusion: This was a political hot potato and the ST writer had both hands tied up first and then write!

Did I spot 'to help'. The qualifying quote marks always suggest untruths have been spoken!

AIM a $2 company has no credibility.

In the end his explanation leaves as much as he didn't explain. It was a weak and clumsy political rebuttal.

With the PAP and government, ST is often caught between the rock and a hard place.

The fog cleared a little and now it has thicken again :-(

1 comment:

  1. Dr Teo does not know what he is talking,check his MBBS,was it from a reputable university?I am doubtful.